Skip to content
BBP India
All stories

Story · Education

How we positioned Eduport in a category nobody thought had room for a third brand.

Kerala's NEET-JEE coaching market was a duopoly — celebrity ads on one side, forty-year legacies on the other. We helped Eduport find the third lane and own it.

Engagement
Strategy · Positioning · Identity · Communication
Duration
Ongoing
Score change
4569
Lead consultant
Ahamed Shine & Dr. Sabira Nalakath

The situation we walked into.

Kerala's NEET-JEE coaching market is one of the most competitive in India. Roughly 50,000 students from the state attempt the medical and engineering entrance exams every year, and the sums are real — a serious aspirant's family will commit anywhere from ₹80,000 to ₹3 lakh per year to coaching. Two brands had locked the conversation between them. On one side, Xylem Learning — Kozhikode-based, fast-growing, fronted by celebrity advertising and a decisively contemporary marketing register. On the other, Brilliant Study Centre in Pala — founded in 1984, four decades of doctors and engineers in its alumni rolls, a near-zero-marketing reputation built entirely on word of mouth. Aspirants chose between the loud one and the legacy one, and most felt their choice was already made for them by their parents' generation. The product was real. The teaching was excellent. The technology — adaptive learning algorithms that would later become the core of Adapt — was already in development. What the brand did not have was a position in the market the consumer could see. Aspirants chose between the loud one and the legacy one, and most felt their choice was already made for them by their parents' generation.

The brief we wrote back.

The default move at this junction is the wrong one. Out-spend Xylem on advertising. Out-result Brilliant on legacy. Both paths are catastrophic. You don't out-spend a brand that has already raised at scale and gone celebrity. You don't out-legacy a brand that has been graduating doctors since 1984. Eduport had neither the capital to do the first nor the time to do the second. We proposed a third path. Don't fight on either of their territories. Take a position structurally unavailable to either. Xylem's economics depend on scale — 4,000-seat lecture halls, mass live classes, standardised pacing. Brilliant Pala's reputation depends on its 40-year offline residential model. Neither can credibly offer what an aspirant in 2022 was beginning to want — a learning experience that adapts to the individual student rather than asking the student to adapt to the institution. That gap was the position. Adaptive learning, personalised pace, individual attention — the brand promise no scale-driven competitor could make. It became the territory Eduport would own.

What we built.

The positioning crystallised into one word — Adapt. We worked alongside the founding team to build the brand around it, end to end. Adapt as the proprietary technology layer. Adapt as the product promise. Adapt as the philosophical claim. The same word doing strategic, technical, and emotional work — the rare positioning device that compounds across every touchpoint. The communication strategy positioned Eduport as Kerala's first adaptive learning NEET / JEE platform. Not the cheapest, not the largest, not the oldest. The first to teach to the student rather than to the syllabus. That single claim became the lens through which every brand asset, course launch, founder interview, and parent-facing communication was filtered. The founder origin story — NIT alumni from struggling backgrounds building affordable coaching for the next student like themselves — became the credibility anchor. It was true, it was specific, and it answered the silent question every aspirant's parent asks: can these people be trusted with my child's future? Most edtech brands in this category lead with results. We led with the founders, because the founders were the brand's most defensible asset. Each of those choices — the Adapt anchor, the third-lane positioning, the founder-led credibility play — was specific, contested, and deliberate. The reasoning lives inside the engagement. Clients see the working. Public Stories carry only the result.

Five years on.

Brand OS™ Score

4569
Score moved from 45 to 69.

Eduport is now consistently named, in independent trade coverage and aggregator listings, as one of the top three NEET-JEE coaching centres in Kerala — alongside Xylem and Brilliant Pala. That ranking, in a market where the top two had been settled for years, is the single clearest signal that the third lane was real and the brand has occupied it. The brand has scaled across formats — online platform, residential repeater campus in Malappuram, regional offline centres — without diluting the core positioning. Adapt is now described in trade reviews as Eduport's defining feature. The AI-driven personalisation, the daily learning goals, the performance analytics, the recommended revision paths — every product capability rolls up to the single brand idea, and consumers describe the brand in the language we wrote. The competitive landscape has shifted around the brand, and the position has held. Xylem was acquired by Physics Wallah for ₹500 crore in mid-2024, which intensified the noise on the loud side of the market. Brilliant Pala continues its quiet, results-only operation on the legacy side. Eduport's third lane has not narrowed under the pressure — it has widened, because parents of NEET / JEE aspirants are increasingly looking for exactly the position the brand owns. The work is not finished. The brand is now extending into new geographies, new exam categories, and new product formats. The architecture holds across each of them, because the architecture was built to.

The argument, in one line.

In a category that looks like a duopoly, the third lane is almost always available. It is not a smaller version of either competitor's position. It is a different question entirely, asked in the language of the customer, answered with a capability the incumbents cannot copy without breaking themselves. Eduport found that question and the answer to it. Most edtech brands at this junction would have spent themselves into the loud lane or starved themselves into the legacy lane. Eduport did neither. The brand is in the market the incumbents do not see, growing in a way they cannot replicate, on a position they do not have an answer to. If you're entering a category that looks taken, most categories that appear locked are not. The third lane exists in almost every duopoly — but finding it requires a diagnostic that reads the incumbents' structural constraints, not just their marketing. The Brand OS™ Diagnostic is built to surface exactly this.

Start here

If your situation rhymes with this one, run the Diagnostic.